|
Morality
and Liturgy
Los
Angeles Religious Education Congress -- March 30 to April 2, 2006
We decided to check out some of the talks at this
year's LA Religiuos Ed Congress - we went to three talks and the
closing Mass. Did a little research before we went and decided to
check out some of the controversial speakers. Here are the three
talks we attended:
Human Sexuality: Nature and Relationships in
Cultural Milieus - Fr. Richard Sparks
Fr. Sparks admits that he got in trouble the last
time he spoke at the Congress about human sexuality - listen here.
Click
here to hear his view on women priests.
His notes for this talk are available at www.calnewman.org
- click on "Human Sexuality" under "Los Angels Congress
Talks" in the left column.
Homosexuality, Celibacy and the Priesthood:
Continuing the Conversation - Dr. Tom Beaudoin with Rev. James
Martin and Dr. Greer Gordon.
Tha Changing Face of the Priesthood
- Five Years Later - Fr. Donald Cozzens
Fr. Cozzens updates the audience chapter by chapter
on his book The Changing Face of the Priesthood. He clearly
thinks the Church should ordain married men, accept gay priests,
and consider women for the priesthood.
Click
here to hear his view on a married, gay and women priesthood
(talk on Sunday, April 2 at 10:00 am). 2.5 minute excerpt.
We have to ask the question - why are speakers
who are clearly dissenting from Church teaching allowed to preach
to our nation's catechists? Why does Cardinal Mahony invite these
same speakers back year after year even after being informed of
their dissent? Here is what Cardinal Mahony had to say during his
online
chat at the Congress:
Bill: Some of the scheduled speakers at
this Religious Education Congress are well-known dissenters of our
Catholic Church teachings. Why are they repeatedly invited back
to the Congress and why are those who are requesting a closer monitoring
of these speakers and asking for 100% orthodoxy being ignored?
CardinalMahony: I simply don't agree with Bill.
Conference Liturgies
This Mass was more of a "show" than
a beautiful sacrifice. It reminded me of the rock concerts I used
to attend in my youth - the music was so loud that it was almost
deafening. There were liturgical dancers (more on that later), dramas
enacting the gospel readings, glass pitchers to hold the Precious
Blood, and many points at which the crowd errupted in applause (see
13 minute video clip for examples of all the above).
Click
here for images from the Youth Day Mass (images from the LA
Religious Education Congress website)
Click here
for expanded video excerpts from the closing Mass (13 minutes) This
video clip will require Flash
8 to view.
___________________________________________________________
During the closing Mass the gospel was read by
a deacon and lay people. During Cardinal Mahony's online chat at
the congress someone asked him:
Matt: "Just curious about
some new things I've seen at church. May a priest change the liturgy
as he sees fit? For example, may he change the words given by ICEL,
use a wooden or glass chalice, or allow a lay person to read the
Gospel or give a homily? Thank you."
CardinalMahony: At Mass, the deacon and priest are the only
ones to proclaim the Gospel and give the homily. Now and then, others
may give a reflection.
___________________________________________________________
Liturgical dancers were present at several of
the Congress Masses (see images and video links above). During Cardinal
Mahony's online
chat at the congress someone asked him:
Mariette: Does Your Eminence believe there
is a place for liturgical dance in the US Church?
CardinalMahony: Liturgical dance should never dominate or
overwhelm the celebration of the Eucharist. It must be tasteful,
and must always lead us to deeper prayer and reflection. A good
rule: if liturgical dance leads to applause by the participants,
then it failed.
Note in the video clip that the liturgical dancing
at the closing Mass did lead to applause.
Here is what Pope Benedict had to say about liturgical
dancing in his book Spirit of the Liturgy (written when he
was Cardinal Ratzinger).
“Dancing is not a form of expression for the Christian
liturgy.” (198)
“It is totally absurd to try to make the liturgy
‘attractive’ by introducing dancing pantomimes (wherever possible
performed by professional dance troupes), which frequently (and
rightly, from the professionals’ point of view) end with applause.
Wherever applause breaks out in the liturgy because of some human
achievement, it is a sure sign that the essence of the liturgy has
totally disappeared and been replaced by a kind of religious entertainment.”
(198)
“None of the Christian rites includes dancing.”
(199)
|